From: "Geo." 

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:45a1d7d8$1{at}w3.nls.net...

> My comment/derision was addressing the editorial comment inserted into the
> "news" story via the "alongside criminals" commentary.

I think that's a fair statement since obviously the people being
fingerprinted are NOT criminals. I didn't take it as commentary, I took it
as a distinguishing fact that makes this an invasion of privacy.

I understand where your comment came from, but I think you missed the point
of the comment, I mean it is a fact that they are not taking fingerprints
because these people broke some law, they are just taking fingerprints of
innocent visitors.

This is no different than the police stopping you on the street and
demanding to see your papers because you might be a bad person. It's wrong
to do this and US citizens should be pissed that this administration would
even considered doing it.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5