From: "thomas p." 

On 19 Mar., 21:24, "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote:
> Innews:1174332745.812707.30260{at}e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
> thomas p.  typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19 Mar., 17:44, "John D.Wentzky"

> > wrote:
> >> Innews:CVyLh.7487$JZ3.622{at}newssvr13.news.prodigy.net,
> >> Dennis Kemmerer  typed:
>
> >>>  wrote in message
> >>>news:1174278927.733609.207620{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> On Mar 18, 8:25 pm, "RamRod Sword of Baal"

> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> "Sound of Trumpet"
 wrote in
> >>>>>
messagenews:1174263570.489478.168630{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...htt
p://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799776/posts
>
> >>>>>> Permitting legal unions apart from marriage
injures young people
> >>>>>> by "placing them in a situation that
does not give security,
> >>>>>> that does not give stability or serenity."
>
> >>>>> Here in Australia de facto relationships are
protected by law.
>
> >>>>> There is no reason why this cannot be done in
other countries, if
> >>>>> it has not
> >>>>> already been done.
>
> >>>> For the simple reason that the people do not want it.
>
> >>> I suspected you were a dimwitted wanker when I responded to your
> >>> last post, and you've confirmed it.
>
> >>> In the 1960s, 'people' didn't want inter-racial marriages either.
>
> >> It had to be pro-choice bigots such as you that didn't want them.
> >> Why aren't people married now, pro-choice idiot bigot?
>
> >>> And in the early 1900s, they didn't want inter-faith marriages.
>
> >> Why are you complaining about that?
> >> Are you against people having the way they like it?-
>
> > No, you are.
>
> I'm not complaining about it.

You're not?  Are you not against people having the right to same-sex marriage?


>
> >  You are against same-sex marriage, right?

>
> Yes.
> Is it a sin to be against same-sex marriages?
> LOL

No.  If you don't want to have a same-sex marriage, you have every right not to.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag