From: "Geo." 

"Monte Davis"  wrote in message
news:7775m0pg88p46m47ocqmnb6peivpm9ciov{at}4ax.com...

> But since the 9/11 attack that "changed everything" was an ingenious
> use of non-weapons, it seems sensible to me to put at least as much
> effort into tightening security in other potential non-weapon hazards
> as in hyperventilating about the weapons they might acquire.

I think it's a waste of time to try to tighten security in "potential
non-weapon hazards". They aren't targeting people, for example I
mentioned tanker trucks but they won't just head downtown to some populated
spot, they would head for a federal reserve city and target a fed bank.

While they do use terrorist methods, the attack pattern changed when they
realized they are much more effective if they can hit economic centers,
major bridges, major airports, etc, anything that would damage the economy.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5