From: "Geo." 

"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:4162b9dd$1{at}w3.nls.net...

> North Korea developed its nuke weapons technology and its first nuclear bomb
> or two under the CLINTON administration.  They did this under the failed
> policy of bi-lateral talks that Kerry wants to return to.   Kerry is an
> idiot who couldn't negotiate his way out of a paper bag, and nothing shows
> this more clearly than his expressed failure to understand that using China
> and Russia in the talks to leverage North Korea's compliance isn't a much
> better way to go combined with his naive statement that entering into
> bilateral negotiations won't undercut and destroy the leverage we gain by
> having China and Russia involved in pressuring North Korea.  The fact that
> he says he wants to return to failed Clinton policy of handling North Korea,
> that allowed North Korea to get its nuke weapons technology and first couple
> of nukes, shows how incompetent and DANGEROUS Kerry is in fact.

and bush's plan is lets ignore them and hope they go away.. or maybe
"it's someone elses problem, they live closer than we do"?

> On Iran the idiot Kerry stated he take the Clinton policy that helped North
> Korea go nuclear and apply to Iran by selling Iran the fuel rods and other
> technology they need.

In case you hadn't noticed, if we don't then someone else will. We tend to
have more say in things if we are involved than if we are not involved.

> more or less, which they proceeded to cheat and develop their nuclear
> technology and first couple of bombs with.

the concern was not that they wouldn't make a couple bombs, the fear was
that they might sell them to bad people.


> According to McCain Saddam would have then fired up his WMD and nuke
> programs again full bore, with more money because sanctions would be gone.

and as soon as that began the saudis and everyone else in the area would
have been begging for us to do something about it and we could have gone in
before he managed to develop anything and with the full support of that
part of the world.

Come on Gary, we knew back in 1991 that we would be back in 10 years
because we didn't finish it then. Bush didn't have to bullshit us and the
rest of the world, he could have set things up like his old man did if
Saddam was really the reason, there was no need for the rush. He wasn't,
the real reason was we were || that close to starting to reduce the
national debt and we just can't have that so we needed another money hole
to keep greenspan and friends happy.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5