| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Win2k ban? |
Hello Alan. 04 Dec 02 06:58, you wrote to me: AZ> It DOES mean that MS will no longer make security patches and service AZ> packs for it, and will take no responsibility for ensuring that new AZ> releases of its other products (such as Office) will run on it-- in AZ> fact, they will try to ensure that new Office releases will NOT run on AZ> it, to help motivate you to upgrade. Yes, but it does naturally become a smaller target for security breaches, since those writing viruses and trojans will now turn their attention more and more to Win XP and Win 2000. As far as Office goes, I have no need of the latest version. I have a copy of Office 97 Professional that has served me in good stead, and does everything for me that I need from it. AZ> I've got a school full of Win95B systems which is also no longer AZ> supported-- but see no reason (and have no budget) to upgrade the AZ> operating systems, applications, or hardware. As long as each AZ> continues to meet the needs of the school, its students and teachers, AZ> we'll keep using them. It's also useful to keep old OS's because you may have old computers that can still perform useful functions on a LAN. Even a DOS box on a 486 can perform well as say, a file server, provided you have good networking software on it. --- GoldED/386 3.0.1-dam3* Origin: MikE'S MaDHousE: WelComE To ThE AsYluM! (1:134/11) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 134/11 10 3613/1275 123/500 106/1 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.