From: "John Beamish" 

You might want to look up the definition of "rake".  Oh, heck,
I'll do it ...

rake

\Rake\, n. [OE. rakel rash; cf. Icel. reikall wandering, unsettled, reika
to wander.] A loose, disorderly, vicious man; a person addicted to lewdness
and other scandalous vices; a debauchee; a rou['e].


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:41683b98$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Yes, he was bit slower on the buzzer last week and missed more than usual,
> then again that also makes his competition look that much sicker  Oh,
and
> I forget the "answer" now, but something about garden
implements in common
> with women and his reply, "Hoe?" broke everyone out in
laughter (vs. the
> correct "Rake.")
>
>
> "Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message
> news:pan.2004.10.09.19.17.21.660046{at}shultzinfosystems.com...
> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:59:25 -0400, Mark wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Richard B."  wrote in message
> >> news:g0gem0t0u6bviqulkor1c9rgvgu1qtv8oq{at}4ax.com...
> >>> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:33:24 -0400, "Robert Comer"
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I haven't seen that, but Bush's desperate tone is a bit much.
> >>>
> >>> He's seems quite passionate to me.  A good guy.
> >>
> >> Yup, he's on the game tonight. I think he could have hammered in a few
> >> points a bit better, so far, but then Jeopardy looks easy on TV too.
> >>
> > Not recently - with that Ken character at 1.8mil, they are rolling out
the
> > big gun questions - even he's having problems with some of them.
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5