"John Edser"  wrote in message
news:cdc3u2$2hoi$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org...
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> So that I am not misunderstood: all positive cases of c,
> within the rule are invalid. This is because
> all positive values of c remain  _ambiguous_ re: the
> measuring OFA and OFM, as Dr O'Hara has reluctantly agreed.
> It is this point of logical ambiguity that nobody wishes to
> discuss, not even Dr O'Hara who agrees that it does exist.
> ____________________________________________________________

So that you are not misunderstood, please indicate when
Dr. O'Hara made this "reluctant" admission of ambiguity.
Was it in his "as far as the rule is concerned, none"
response?  If so, do you believe that this is a fair
and correct interpretation of his response, and that Dr.
O'Hara would agree that it is fair and correct?
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 7/19/04 6:06:05 AM