From: "Gary Britt" 

You've got it completely wrong.  The Duefler report shows just how much
Iraq did have that Duefler didn't account for and couldn't find; actually
states Saddam's intent was to use the puppets he had bribed, France,
Chirac, Russia, Putin, to quickly end sanctions and then dig up, bring back
from Syria and Libya.

Hussein had an ongoing nuke program in Libya and who knows what hidden in
Syria.  200 un accounted for WMD scientists, etc etc etc.

You are just completely wrong on your assessment.

Gary

"Don Hills"  wrote in message
news:JHOaBtgaXOXD092yn{at}attglobal.net...
> In article , "Gary Britt"

wrote:
> >Because they didn't have and weren't trying to develop WMD and weren't a
> >threat to provide WMD to Al Qaeda.  Its pretty simple really.
>
> Iraq didn't have WMD and would find it difficult to develop them. As the
> monitoring program proved, it's one thing to have plans but quite another
to
> actually gather the infrastructure and materials needed without being
> detected. Other countries have already developed WMD and would be more
> likely than Iraq was to supply them to terrorists if it would discomfort
> the USA or the West in general. Surely it would be smart to target the
most
> immediate threats first, both WMD source and money source?
>
> --
> Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
> It's ironic that people who are too smart to engage in politics
> are governed by people who are not as smart.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5