| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Bush weak in debate |
From: "Mark"
How so John? Prior to 9/11 the FBI couldn't talk with the CIA. Then even
after the first attack on the WTC in '93, where their lack of ability to
communicate was particularly harmful, rather than fix it, that firewall was
strengthened even further by Jamie Gorelick in '96 or so. Then Torricelli
pushed through a demand that the CIA only hire pristine informants, thus
destroying their ability to hire people that might actually know something
or be capable of infiltrating to find out anything.
But I am interested in why you think it revisionist.
"John Beamish" wrote in
message news:4169da38{at}w3.nls.net...
> That's a rather revisionist history.
>
> "Mark" wrote in message
news:4169b1bd$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>> I was just throwing a little levity on the thread.
>>
>> But, now that I think of it, there is another viewpoint here that also
>> relates to liberty. If we prevent our government from using tools to
> monitor
>> the terrorist threat efficiently (as we did pre 9/11)
> [snip]
>
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.