From: "Robert G Lewis" 


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:41727487{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:41725894{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> I'll be surprised if it's not 54%, or higher, in the popular vote for
>>> Bush.
>>
>> Maybe, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were 54%+ for Kerry either,
>
> True enough, anything can happen.
>
>> Bush has done some stupid things in this presidency,
>
> They all do though. If not stupid, certainly not to the approval of one
> group or another.
>
>> and it's not just the left that is going to vote for him.
>
> True too, I'm not on the left and I'll be voting for him 
>
> Still, in rereading the Times editorial, it still comes across as very
> childish to me - yes that kind of language and their assumptions will
> appeal to the base, but I doubt many independents buy into it. (and I see
> I forgot to include the url)
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/opinion/17sun1.html
>

Not just to you

NYT Endorses Kerry

Was this endorsement written by a 5 year old?

For full context: The NYT regularly endorses Republicans, such as Pataki,
though it's no surprise they've endorsed a Dem for president. But, more
importantly, what's the point of making an endorsement which reads as if it
were written in crayon?

http://atrios.blogspot.com/2004/10/nyt-endorses-kerry.html

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5