From: jeff 

Adam Flinton wrote:
> Jeff Shultz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:54:18 +0100, Adam Flinton wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Geo. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Oh right, providing Al Qaeda doesn't count?
>>>>
>>>> Geo.
>>>>
>>>> "Gary Britt"  wrote
in message
>>>> news:41689aa0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Because they didn't have and weren't trying to develop WMD and
>>>>> weren't a
>>>>> threat to provide WMD to Al Qaeda.  Its pretty simple really.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh? What significant support was Iraq providing
for "international
>>>>>> terrorism"? If GWB was serious with that
statement, why didn't he
>>>>>> invade Saudi Arabia?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Gas attack on Tokyo underground - 8 dead
>>
>>
>>
>> Sucessfully prosecuted by Japanese Gov't.
>
>
> Yup &? 8 dead? A bad day on a major road claims more than that. So are
> roads now WMD?
>
What volume of sarin was used.... and was it spread about (aerosol'd) in a
military fashion?

Let's see... 1 sarin "thing" = multiple deaths.

How many cars travel down the freeway per death?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5