From: "Codebreaker{at}bigsecret.com" 

On Mar 19, 4:40 am, "arah"  wrote:
>  Paul Was A Deceiver!
>
> He was Satan In The Flesh! An Antichrist!
>
> Matthew 24:4-5 states you will be deceived by people that come using
> Jesus' name. Consider the parable of the sower. Jesus was warning us
> then that as soon as His Gospel was preached, the enemy (Paul) would
> be there to steal the truth!
>
> ***The real (untranslated) name of Jesus is Y'hoshua   (pronounced
> like the name Joshua but with a Y, YoHoshua, some pronounce his name
> as Yeshua). All refer to the Son of God who came as the promised
> Messiah
>
> Now before you throw a tantrum and wonder why I haven't been struck by
> lightening straight from the throne room of God, I can prove to you
> that Paul was a Fraud using his own words. Of course, if you're a
> female, and you're in the ministry, you already know he was, you
> probably just didn't realize it! For to be a female and in the
> ministry of the Lord, you had to turn your back on Paul to follow
> Jesus. Congrats! You figured it out! You refused to buy into the lie
> pie Satan tried to sell you as Paul!
>
> I'm going to make some startling points to wake your mind up into the
> truth, so hear me out, then I'll go through and explain each one and
> give you all the proof you need to see for yourself that what I'm
> saying is indeed the truth.
>
> Paul was Satan in the Flesh
>
> Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the Disciples OR Jesus

The information given in the Bible says otherwise. Now the question the Bible or you?
>
> Paul was never trained by the disciples, the men who walked, talked,
> and broke bread with our Saviour. He received his knowledge from
> "revelations."
This is what revelation means. No human training is needed

>
> Paul's account of his Damascus Road Experience changed every time he
> told it, thus the disciples knew he was lying.
How about Luke changing the story to fit the need of his audience. I am not
saying Luke was being a fraud, but that Paul experience was obvious to
anyone that there was no need to embelish it

>
> Paul declared he was teaching another Gospel of which he himself was
> the Father
Without the Gospel of Paul you will be stoned to death for working on
Saturday, you will be circumcised and taking ablution before prayers. You
will turn to Jerusalem for prayers, you will be colonized by the JEWISH
COSTUM. Adutlerers will be stoned to death. You will considered leprosy as
a curse from God Impur people with leprozy will be segrated and not
attended to You will not eating pork.
You will not own dogs.
Are you attracted to Islam? It Is Paul teaching in REVERSE

>
> Paul declared  he himself was the son of God

Reference????
>
> Paul issued his own commandments and laws for people to adhere to

He did not issue the dietary Law that the Apostles decreed during the
Council of Jerusalem. But his explanation about the fact that the dietary
Law elements of
the Old COVENANT can't exist within the CONTEXT of the NEW COVENANT make sense.
After all Jesus is reported to have said that you can't put the A New wine
in the Old jar
>
> Paul taught the exact Opposite of what Jesus and His real disciples
> did.
What did Jesus taught?  Weere you there when Jesus was teaching

>
> Paul worked to destroy and undo everything Jesus and His disciples did
> and were doing.
Like what? Like running away from the Gentiles because they were impure for
not being circumcised? That is a good thing I like him for that.

>
> Paul was never repentant for being the greatest persecutor of
> Christians at that time! He boasted about it! Over and Over!

You are taking God's place. It is for God to know If he did or did not. He
is the only one you can read the heart

>
> Paul said God's law was a Curse. Jesus said it was a blessing. Who's
> lying?
Where did Jesus say that? Jesus was put to death because he was accused of
breaking Moses Law by working on Sabbath day. He was later rejected as the
Christ by Israel because Moses Law says:" CURSED IS THE ONE HUNG ON
THE TREE" It is easy to misuse the Law. This is what the Scribes were
doing as a result Jesus cursed them: WOE TO YOU PHARISEES AND SCRIBES
BECAUSE YOU USE THE LAW TO ENSLAVE THE POORS

>
> Paul condemned Jesus and His disciples for false teachings, he
> condemned Jesus Himself for having long hair in 1 Corinthians 11:14,
> something approved in Numbers 6:5 and Judges 13:5.

No, it was saying that Jesus the Christ and as the Christ he was entitled
to some special priviledges because you will never sin. Men frequently do
sin
>
> Jesus Said: Keep the Sabbath (Mark 2:27), circumcise male children
> (Luke 2:21), Paul Said: Circumcision is not necessary (Romans 2:26)
> that is going against what the Christ said in Luke 2:21.
Even the Islamic doctrine which poist itself as the defender of Law of
Moses by enforcing circumcision and some other commendments of Moses Law
did not follow the SABBATH to the Letter. It chose Friday as the day of
rest for the UMMAH. Some calendars put Friday as the day when Jesus was put
to death.

>
> In 1 Corinthians 15:1 Paul says that he was not giving them anything
> but what "he preached." He explained this even further in the second
> book (or letter) to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 11:17). It reads -
> "That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were
> foolishly, in this confidence of boasting." He's telling you plain and
> simple he was speaking of himself and not from or of the Lord!"
Boasting was a sin and not a virtu. Paul did not learn boasting from Jesus
Himself from the world which praise such people. Jesus being holy, there
was no boasting in him. You are being too literal, here you are dealing
with RHETORIC

>
> Paul cursed Jesus and His disciples

POST YOUR REFERENCE
>
> Paul claimed he himself was the son of God
POST YOUR REFERENCE. CITE PLEASE

>
> Paul Supported and demanded Adherence to Iniquity (Discrimination),
> Jesus said to not let it be found among us! Who's lying?
Jesus know the difference between man and woman and their different
responsabilities. SECULAR TEACHING DON'T. He knew that women get pregnant
and men don't... Good thing Paul imitated Jesus

>
> Jesus: When Yahshua confronts the Adversary, he defeats him by saying,
> "You shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of YHWH,
> and Him alone will you serve."
>
> Paul: When Paul is mobbed by people who wish to stone him for
> preaching against the Law of YHWH, he relies on the worldly
> authorities as a Roman entitled to the protection of the government
> rulers who save him (Dt. 8:3, Mt.4:4, Acts 22:26, 23:27
Between the barbarian Law of the Jew and their court and the Roman court I
would do exactly what Paul did. At least he had the right to defend himself
before being mobbed abd stoned to death as it should have be done within
the Jewish court.

>
> Jesus: "DO NOT CALL ANYONE ON EARTH YOUR FATHER; for ONE IS YOUR
> FATHER, HE who is in heaven"
> (Matthew 23:9)
>
> The devil 'PAUL' BLASPEMOUSLY BOASTED
>
> "For I BECAME YOUR FATHER"
> (1 Corinthians 4:15)

Did this force you to call him father? You are still calling Paul and there
is no Law against that. I think you are being too literal.
What do you call your biological father?

>
> " JESUS came to Galilee PREACHING THE GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM "
> (Mark 1:14, Matt.4:23).
> JESUS said " THIS GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM will be PREACHED, IN MY NAME
> in all the world
> (Matt.24:14).
> 'PAUL' CAME preaching, by his own admission, ANOTHER GOSPEL PROMOTING
> LAWLESSNESS and LICENTIOUSNESS.

  Paul brilliantly preached the same Gospel within the context
of the New COVENANT that Jesus contracted with mankind. He might have
missed the points that he put forward. Read Him again but not before you
fully understand the TORAH OF MOSES

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag