BK>> Well, those of you who insisted you wanted to get Wilson under
 BK>> oath, under penalty of perjury, looks like you'll get your wish.

 BK>> Of course, the republicans could have had that any time they
 BK>> wanted, just call him before congress and require him to testify
 BK>> under oath.

 BK>> Since they chose not to, you'll have to settle for a lawsuit,
 BK>> filed by Joe and Valerie Wilson. And guess who gets named. How
 BK>> about Dick Cheney. And will he have to testify? Well, when it
 BK>> was Clinton, in a lawsuit the judge ruled was absolutely without
 BK>> merit, he had to testify anyway. Now that it's Cheney, he's only
 BK>> the VP, he has less of an excuse. Wanna see Cheney weasle?

 BK>> Karl Rove, your witness chair is waiting.

 BK>> I am lookng forward to this. Hope you are too.

 FS> Don't hold you breath, Bob.  Apparently the charge is
 FS> entirely without merit and will be thrown out ...

 Not likely on either point.

 And if you really want to see Wilson testify under oath you
 should hope it does not get thrown out.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... This is too much like reality for me.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5