George White wrote in a message to Tom Torfs:

 GW> I tested it with Borland C 3.1. Corrections required (where
 GW> appropriate original code shown commented out above the change)
 GW> are:



Well yes, back when that was written I was still careless enough to mix
these (the fact that Borland C++ 3.0 doesn't say anything about this at its
default warning level didn't help).

 GW>       if (fsize<65280)
 GW>       if (fsize<65280L)         /* GW - Warning: "Constant
is long"

Well, yes. Rather silly warning, I always thought. 65280U should also shut it up :-)

 GW>       if (packer == PACK_UNKNOWN
 GW>           & fsize>0x20)

Did it really say that ? (looking...) Yes it did... oops! Must be && ofc.

 GW> Note: These last two are not in the multi-part post but were in the
 GW> original single message post.

Huh? They were the same program. Probably something got mixed up during the
transfer...

 GW> - Error: "Statement missing ;" */

...because I'm sure BCC3.0 would have caught _this_ :-)

greetings,
Tom
tomtorfs{at}village.uunet.be

--- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+