| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Ultimate Optical Capability, A possible Mathematical Model Expe |
From: "Sidor . Kurt" To: Reply-To: "Sidor . Kurt" Dear List, At my current job I have been designing optical encoders utilizing diffractive optics principals. I have numerous Mathcad files utilizing Fresnel and Fraunhoffers models for simulating diffractive effects. With slight dimensional scaling I have run a few simulations of Raleighs and Dawes criterions for an ATM size 6" diameter aperture case. Lambda = 550 nM (0.00022") wavelength of light D = 6 inches, mirror diameter Raleigh Criterion: "Stars are said to be "just resolved" when the center of one Airy disc falls upon the first minimum of the second Airy disc" (according to Hect, OPTICS, third edition) For a 6" diameter 1.22*Labmda/D = 0.92 arcseconds Dawes says stars can be resolved at 4.5/D seconds of arc, or in our case 0.77 arcseconds. (Smith, MODERN OPTICAL ENGINEERING) I plotted some Mathcad graphs of Fraunhoffer diffraction patterns separated at these spacings of 0.92 and 0.77 arcseconds respectively. The results can be seen here: http://images.andale.com/f2/115/106/3663062/1042483409819_RALEIGHDAWES1.JPG The separate Airy disc intensities are plotted on the left with the mathematical summations plotted to the right. The Raleigh separation shows a "contrast" of 28% change in the intensity from the brightest peak of one Airy disc to the dimmer "shade of gray" that resolves it from the next one. Due to the slope of the Airy discs central bright core when you reduce the spacing from 0.92 arcseconds to 0.77 arcseconds this intensity "contrast" reduces to only a 4% difference from the brightes peak to the "shade of gray". This result implies that a "contrast" change as small as 4% could be detected by Dawes defining his "limit". I then created a new model of summing the intensities of 100 Airy discs defining an object 5 arcseconds wide for the same Fraunhoffer pattern created by a 6" aperture. This was identical to the previous model using only two to define two stars but now I am creating an "extended" object by mathematically putting them all next to eachother. Then I removed one of the sections in the middle of my source simulating a dark line 0.05 arcseconds wide. The resulting change in the surface intesity of my 5 arcsecond object was a 6% "contrast" change. This contrast change is greater then what the Dawes criterion of 4% contrast needs as a minimum. The plot of this dark line (0.05 seconds wide) against a 5 arcsecond object can be seen here: http://images.andale.com/f2/115/106/3663062/1042483417451_RALEIGHDAWES2.JPG This does not imply that a 6" telescope can "resolve" (as one would classically use the word) 0.05 arcseconds but it does imply that one could detect the prescence of a dark feature that small against a brighter background although its "gray" width would be quite subtle. I would guess that Martian "canals" would fall into this category. Before I created my model of an "extended" object 5 arcseconds wide, I tried using smaller objects. I tried 1.8 arseconds, twice the Raleigh criteria. My results were poor and I could not "resolve" dark features against it. I believe the cause of this is the slope of the central bright spot in the Airy disc. This slope itself is too wide and my "extended" object of only 1.8 arcseconds would not create a "plateu" of uniform "flat" light intensity across its middle width, it just looked like a wide Airy disc. In other words the diffractive edge effects washed out the small features because they were too close to the edge of the object to be "resolvable". You need to be some finite distance in from the edge before any change in contrast can be detected. I then increased my width to 5 seconds of arc and got a good looking "flat" plateu. Any thoughts? This is all just a mathematical model, I lack the personal experience of being an experienced observer of things like Saturns ring divisions or Martian canals. I'm just an engineer who's worked with diffraction too much in the last few years. Regards, Kurt Sidor Mechanical Engineer Dynamics Research Corp. Encoder Division --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.