On Sep 13 17:56 96, Rob Judd of 3:632/103.69 wrote:

 >> >> you should just be able to enter

 >> >> http://127.0.0.1

 >> RJ> Yeah, I tried that today and it worked. Not much use,
 >> RJ> although I can now read the docs at least and so I thank

 >> Do you have a name server running ?

 RJ> I was planning to implement that on my Linux box, but it 
 RJ> isn't ready yet and doesn't need to be for a couple of 
 RJ> weeks. Do I detect an implication in this question that 
 RJ> perhaps you consider a name server necessary before the ICS 
 RJ> will run correctly ? For a stand-alone web server running 
 RJ> plain Warp I wouldn't have expected that.

The implication, was that anything called up by the TCP stack, by name
rather than address, would (if not the local machine) need to have a name
server running to translate it. Even your own machine takes advantage of a
name servers running on it to speed up access to your tcp stack, even
though the local host name is set...

Just a thought though....
Greg

--- Msgedsq/2 2.2e