From: "Jeff Shultz" 

"Steven Durrett"  wrote in message
news:3925A3A9.82C25DC5{at}pacbell.net...
> Bill -
>
> The problem I see with the Oregon provision is that while it clearly
> provides freedom to worship Jehovah (aka "Almighty God") in
any way one
> wishes, it arguably may not protect  anything else. It would depend on
> whether a court interpreted the first religion clause (Section 2), and
> whether the judges felt it defined the scope of the other clauses.
>
> Is Oregon's Supreme Court elected?

Yes, it is. One of the positions was covered by the primary we just had.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5