Re: Best terminal for BBS
  By: Sean Dennis to Dimitri Papadopoulos on Fri Feb 27 2009 11:30 am

 >
 >  DP> RIP screens are part of the BBS history and heritage.
 >
 > RIP is part of BBS history, yes, but a majority of us believe that is where
 > RIP belongs.  Out of the thousands of boards I've called over the years,
 > especially in this last decade, all have used ANSI.

A BBS can, of course, support *both* ANSI and RIP, seamlessly. Unless you
actually connected with a RIP-enabled client, you shouldn't be able to tell if
a BBS supports RIP or not.

That said, my BBS (and Synchronet in general) is RIP enabled, but there seem to
be very few users interested in using RIP terminals.

                                            DdIiGgIiTtAaLl MmAaNn

Snapple "Real Fact" #79:
There are 119 grooves on the edge of a quarter.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32