Hi! Ed,

On Thu, 03 Oct 13, you wrote to me:

 EV> WFWG 3.11 probably does look better than my W3.1. Tom gave me a copy 
 EV> of WFWG 3.11 but I haven't put it on the 486 box yet to see how it 
 EV> looks, I would figure there wouldn't be much difference in those 
 EV> older versions of Windows, but there may me.?

Within the Win 3.xx versions, no, there isn't much difference.  I tried
installing it, a couple of times, into a vBox config but I couldn't get
past first base.

 EV> I probably could start WFWG with my W.BAT file if I ever installed
 EV> it because I figure it probably starts with a WIN.EXE file.
 EV> And if I did use my .BAT file I wouldn't see the 'beautiful'
 EV> difference(s) anyway.

Yes, it started that way.  My multi-config (MS-DOS 5/6) Config.Sys &
AutoExec.Bat had multiple bootups for running with or without WFWG.  (BTW,
for a short while I was running WFWG on MS-DOS 7.00 [Win95's DOS], till I
found a way to break it.)

 EV> It looks like you 'modernized' your WFWG 3.11 by using the Amiga
 EV> image. I can't remember, was the Amiga Computer sold during the 
 EV> period WFWG 3.11 was sold?

Nice question.  All I can recall was that we bought our 486DX33 & WFWG
in early (Jan/Feb) 1994.  I started the BBS in late '94 and made contact
with the Amiga guy in early '95.  He may have only just bought his as well,
as it looked fairly new.  I don't know for sure.

Cheers,
Paul.

... Hire a teenager while they still know it all.
--- Paul's Win98SE VirtualBox