From: stumper 

Lucifer wrote:
> On Mar 20, 8:39 pm, stumper  wrote:
>> Lucifer wrote:
>>> On Mar 20, 6:25 pm, stumper  wrote:
>>>> Attila < wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:29:03 -0400, stumper
 in
>>>>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>> "J Young"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1174366535_347{at}sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>>>>>>>> This is a problem which I've been posting
about for years. The worst
>>>>>>>> problem of all is 'Catholic-bashing',
which is reaching epidermic
>>>>>>>> proportions.
>>>>>> My sincere apologies.
>>>>>> There are four clueless hate-mongers here
>>>>>> who call themselves atheists.
>>>>>> I'll be posting their names soon.
>>>>>> Once you filter them out,
>>>>>> you would see a much peaceful place.
>>>>>> May God bless you.
>>>>> Which one?  There are so many candidates.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
>>>> What do you propose to replace theism?
>>>> We have tried atheistic Communism and Nazism.
>>>> They were worse than any other blind faith in history.
>>>> What is your atheist blind faith?
>>>> Nationalism?
>>>> Socialism?
>>>> Capitalism?
>>>> Capitalistic Jingoism?
>>>> American Patriotism?
>>>> --
>>>> ~Stumper
>>> One word for ya mate. Twat.
>>> Now, Nazism, as anyone person who knows anythign about it, was
>>> spearheaded by a catholic (supported, at the time, by the then pope,
>>> and the current one).
>> I seriously doubt any of them were religious in the good sense.
>> You don't need to buy their rhetoric wholesale.
>
> Religious in the good sense? No such thing. Good people do good, and
> bad people do bad. It takes religion for good people to do bad.
>

Always?

Gee, you are fond of hasty generalizations. That usually is a clear sign of
hidden blind faith.

How do you know good from bad?
Do you have any standards?

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag