The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> Take climate change. Whole rafts of proactive legislation that does not
> addfess an existing problem that affects people, but a *possible* future
> one that *might* affect people, that in any case does *not* address
> carbon *emissions*, only make profits for 'green' 'renewable' companies
> who are heavily subsidised as well. They cant fail. Except they do all
> the time.
>
> Legislation is the primary way to market product no one wants or needs,
> by mandating its adoption. And thus obsoleting existing perfectly
> functional product.
True true - Tesla becomes green after >200000km if all goes well and you do
not replace the battery after 5y. Until then the best is diesel fuel - the
one they want to ban, because it's engine is most efficient and green.
I was shocked - there were studies - big studies - "they" refused to make
public. Crazy!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|