===========================================================================
BBS: The Matrix BBS
Date: 02-16-98 (11:13) Number: 195
From: JACK SARGEANT Refer#: NONE
To: ALL Recvd: NO
Subj: 2 2/3 Conf: (195) UFO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Continued from previous message
life.'
Blather would agree, but would assume that in order to propose the
latter theory, one has to consider the former.
Reader Stephen Gallagher, on the chances of another lifeform
utilising radio.
'If we're talking of life of a 'similar intelligence' to human,
then it seems very likely that at some stage in their development
that they would invent radio technology.
'If they were any way intelligent then I don't think they would
have made a decision like [deciding that radio was obsolete],
I can't see how radio is going to go out of fashion any time
soon.'
Blather stated that 'It's worth realising that our perception of
intelligence is potentially chauvinistic and very subjective -- if it
doesn't seem intelligent to us it's just not intelligent. The
perceived intelligence of another lifeform seems dependent on its
ability to communicate with us'.
To which Stephen responded:
'So there is no such thing as some absolute measure of
intelligence? I think we can be fairly objective in this matter
with regards to assessing the potential 'intelligence' behind
something like a radio transmission. If we detect some signal
that can't be attributed to already known radio sources like
quasars etc. then we can investigate in more detail whether the
signal has the necessary complexity to have an intelligent
source.'
Derek Bell piped up with:
'About two distinct intelligent species being unable to
understand each others' language: this is quite plausible if
Chomsky's linguistics is a good model of what happens in
intelligent beings. Basically, Chomsky proposes that humans have
a "meta-grammar" (my term) in our genes that describes the types
of language that humans can speak/write/whatever. If another
intelligent species appears with a quite different meta-grammar,
there may be no common ground for them to communicate! (The two
meta-grammars having no grammars in common.)'
And Pat Marren:
'The real test of the feasibility of SETI is, how long is it
likely to take before some superior civilization beams us an
order for take-out Chinese? That, of course, depends upon the
density of "sun-like stars" in our neighborhood of the galaxy,
and the probability that each might give rise to civilizations
with a taste for Chinese food.
'The earth began emitting a decent amount of human-broadcast
radio waves about seventy-five years ago. Assuming the speed of
light is constant, that means we are at the center of an
ever-expanding communications shell of a radius of seventy-five
light years. Assuming further that our alien pals are hungry, and
therefore prompt about sending out a reply, the "reply" radius is
currently half of seventy-five light-years, or about 37 light
years.
'Carl Sagan states his belief that if one in a million sun-like
stars foster intelligent life, then there are millions of
instances of intelligent life in the galaxy. Now I don't believe
in UFOs, because if I were a superior being I would not be
mucking around trailer parks in search of sexual experimentation.
I'd go right to the center of the action -- the West Wing of the
White House. But Sagan was obviously right. There must be
millions of civilizations-- it's just statistics.
'So my question as a taxpayer must be, how many sun-like stars
are there within 37 light years? And how many sun-like stars is
our ever-expanding sphere of radio emanations likely to encompass
before I am out of the taxpayer role and in a trailer park? A
million? If it's a million, then it's worth it. If it's
thirty-seven or fifteen, then the hell with it.
Blather reader Al Tepper is conducting a survey on subjectivity for
his masters at http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~tepper/survey.htm and
invites all readers to take part.
Arthur Goldstuck, in South Africa, has named Blather as this week's
Legendary Site of the Week. See the
listing at http://www.web.co.za/arthur/leglist.html and Arthur's
'Legends from a Small Country' site, at
http://www.web.co.za/arthur/welcome.html
ERRATA
No one, other than the fastidiously vigilant Paul (Archeire
http://www.archeire.com) Clerkin spotted the glaring mistake in last
weeks issue, where I appeared to claim that Carl Sagan's book
'Cosmos' was 'the best selling book in the English language'. What
Blather really meant was 'best selling science book'.
Dave (daev) Walsh
13th February 1998
Feedback and comments to
Have your say: http://www.nua.ie/blather/blabber/
*******************************************************************
NUA INTERNET SURVEYS
A weekly newsletter, Internet Surveys is a free digest of the most
interesting surveys containing data relating to the Internet.
It is available by sending an email to
with the word "subscribe" in the body of
the message.
NUA WHAT'S NEW
A monthly newsletter, What's New is a free monthly newsletter
highlighting the new additions, happenings and changes at Nua.
It is available by sending an email to
with the word "subscribe" in the body of the message.
NUA NEW THINKING
New Thinking is a free, weekly, 500-word email column, whose
objective is to contribute to a practical philosophy for The
Digital Age. It is available by sending an email to
with the word "subscribe" in
the body of the message.
*******************************************************************
>>> Continued to next message
--- FMail 1.22
---------------
* Origin: -=Keep Watching the Skies=- ufo1@juno.com (1:379/12)
|