From: Adam Flinton 

Jeff Shultz wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:46:16 +0100, Adam Flinton wrote:
>
>
>>Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:22:43 +0100, Adam Flinton
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:01:50 -0400, Robert Comer
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>No evidence that Israel has either.  Still we
all KNOW that Israel
>>>>>>>has nukes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's because they have -- down in SA.  (No full nukes, but
>>>>>>definitely  the
>>>>>>precursors)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And who knows, it could have been us that gave them the nukes
>>>>>>outright...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- Bob Comer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No, the flash I read about was debunked as a meteorite
impact on the
>>>>>atmosphere.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>There is a lot more information than that.
>>>>
>>>>Go ask your gov. Do you trust Mr Bush & his admin? If
so, go ask them.
>>>>
>>>>Adam
>>>
>>>
>>>I didn't ask my government.  These were science magazines soon after the
>>> incident.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>The go ask em. You have a freedom of infomration act do you not?
>>
>>You'll be surprised how much your gov knows wrt Israeli nukes.
>>
>>Of course they can't tell you, the rest of the US public or indeed the
>>world at large without bring into effect various US anti-proliferation
>>laws, so at present everyone is maintaining a fiction by saying "ah well
>>the Israelis haven't actually confirmed officially that they've got nukes,
>>and while if we put information A together with information B we will have
>>proof, we are not going to for political reasons."
>>
>>I mean, it would be pure hell if you had to act towards Israel wrt
>>proliferation, occupying others etc. as your own law says you should.
>>
>
>
> Then what good would a FOIA request do? If it would do any good, it would
> have been made (probably has been) and the info would have been on the
> Internet for the past 5 years.
>

There are ways of avoiding requests by feigning ignorance. Ask long enough
with enough direct evidence & you might be surprized.

A good example is wrt Fylingdales & the X-Band Radar & Molesworth
& the interceptor rockets (wrt missile defence).

UK gov says nothing being built {at} fylingdales & no plans to base
interceptor missiles there. Both true statements however......

Nothing being built != nothing planned to be built & no missiles {at}
fylingdales != no missiles in the UK.

So far the public t'aint twigged this yet because when asked very straight
questions the gov gives very straight (& legally correct) answers which
are none the less misleading.

Adam

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5