From: "Robert Comer" 

I don't do threaded, I sort by date and time.

> In the case up thread I see Geo's post up thread of yours, but yours
> displays an earlier date/time. So the logical order is correct.

And in my view Glenn's answer to you is before your post.

- Bob Comer


"Paul Ranson"  wrote in message
news:418feca6{at}w3.nls.net...
> By 'questions after answers' I mean in your display rather than timewise.
>
> In the case up thread I see Geo's post up thread of yours, but yours
> displays an earlier date/time. So the logical order is correct.
>
> If you're seeing wrong threading then something is broken either in your
> software or configuration.
>
> Paul
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:418fe65d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> You'll never see questions after answers, so the problem is a minor one.
>>> IMO.
>>
>> ??  I do all the time.  (I do a lot in newsgroups, especially microsoft
>> ones, so it's not just barktopus)
>>
>> - Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Paul Ranson"  wrote in message
>> news:418fd7ef$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
>>> news:418facae$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>The protocol still works and the messages appear in the
right order.
>>>>>The date is really FYI.
>>>>
>>>> No it doesn't, not if you have it set to view in date/time
order, which
>>>> is what I always do.
>>>>
>>>> - Bob Comer
>>>
>>> You'll never see questions after answers, so the problem is a minor one.
>>> IMO.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5