Hi Charles, as you were just saying about Back To The 50's....
CH> CH> Your analogy is not on point.
CH> 
CH> RT>As far as his house is concerned, it most certainly is.
CH> 
CH> Not really.  He certainly has the right to not accept or want
CH> calls; but that's not the issue that I find bothersome.  What I find
CH>  bothersome is that caller-id is certainly a device to make people
CH> more reclusive and anti-social. 
Not really.  It simply allows me to be as selective about who I talk
to as the calling party is to who he/she calls.  If you don't wish me
to know who you are, please don't expect me to answer my phone.
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X I'm trying to think......but nothing happens.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------