From: "Robert G Lewis" 

Yeah I saw he other message after I posted  and I was unable to cancel.

Bob Lewis

"Robert Comer"  wrote in
message news:4190f888{at}w3.nls.net...
> >I take it you do not have group by conversation check. Sorting by date
> >and time would make sense in a flat view on multiple computers.
>
> Exactly.
>
> - Bob Comer
>
>
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:4190ea06$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>I take it you do not have group by conversation check. Sorting by date and
>>time would make sense in a flat view on multiple computers.
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>>
>> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
>> news:4190a448{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> I've not noticed any problem reading (wasn't looking for particular
>>>> time stamps though) I have OE "view" "group
by conversation" and "hide
>>>> read," then have "sent" sorted with newest
date at the bottom.
>>>
>>> That style doesn't work when you're accessing from multiple computers,
>>> that's why I sort by date and time -- *MUCH* easier to keep track of
>>> what I read that way.
>>>
>>> - Bob Comer
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:41903744{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> I've not noticed any problem reading (wasn't looking for particular
>>>> time stamps though) I have OE "view" "group
by conversation" and "hide
>>>> read," then have "sent" sorted with newest
date at the bottom.
>>>>
>>>> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
>>>> news:4190204c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>> Maybe he's sorting on the wrong field by accident.
>>>>>
>>>>> *NO* I'm sorting by date and time, exactly as I want it.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Bob Comer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5