From: "Robert Comer" 

> Remember.. we were still at war with Saddam. He never actually
> surrendered.

We never declared war on him to begin with is memory serves me, and even if
we did that's a silly argument for destroying them again -- there's no
threat, and nothing for us to truly gain, only to lose.

- Bob Comer


"jeff"  wrote in message
news:419b94d8{at}w3.nls.net...
> Remember.. we were still at war with Saddam. He never actually
> surrendered.
>
> Robert Comer wrote:
>> It's the only sane, and legal, thing to do.
>>
>> - Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:419964ef{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>>"Geo"  wrote in message
news:4199647b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>>>Afghanistan was not a pre-emptive strike, it was a reactive
strike. (and
>>>>they have 28mil people)
>>>
>>>So, you're advising that we waited to do a reactive strike against
>>>Saddam? No thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5