> > > PF:-
> > > It is _not the counting_ of reproductive survivals
> > > that ought to
> > > be the topic for our discussions (ideally that is ;->)! It is the
> > > evolutionary pressures (and instructive categories of 
> > > pressures at that)
> > > which caused us to be here IN THE WAY THAT (HOW) WE ARE that 
> > > ought to be
> > > discussed.

> > JE:-
> > Peter, your logic remains faulty.
> > No categorisation of evolutionary
> > pressures is possible. All that
> > can be categorised are individual
> > responses to environmental (external
> > to self) pressures. Similar individuals
> > can and do, respond quite differently
> > to the same environmental pressures so it
> > remains useless attempting to categorise
> > environmental pressures. If you wish
> > to attempt to do so all environmental
> > pressures are "opportunity type" pressures,
> > no exceptions.

> PF:-
> With your unrealistic resistance to proven [by both philosophy 
> and science]
> lines of reasoning (and logic) you remain as actively AEVASIVE 
> (or -- if you
> prefer this attribute without my an EPTly embedded in-dEPTth 
> explanation --
> evasive) versus What Is going on in respect of how we evolved and are, as
> ever.

JE:- 
I "remain as actively 
AEVASIVE  [..] evasive" ?

I repeat:
All environmental pressures 
are just "opportunity type" 
pressures, no exceptions.

I strongly recommend FIRSTLY 
applying your EPT system to 
your own questionable state 
of mind...


Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105

Australia
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 8/10/04 6:26:52 AM