From: John Cuccia 

That was Gary, not me.  All I said was that the lack of explosions since
9/11 proved nothing w/r/t the effectiveness of the Bush policy. Gary thinks
that the absence of new attacks proves that Bush has been effective.

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:22:12 -0800, jeff  wrote:

>Ah, a desire for an ongoing proof of a negative... (there haven't been
>any explosions yet...)
>
>John Cuccia wrote:
>> There's no evidence that supports the contention you make below.
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:33:15 -0500, "Gary Britt"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It might cause more explosions but NOT on USA soil.  There is
NO evidence or
>>>reasoning from past experience that supports any other contention.
>>>
>>>Gary

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5