-=> Quoting MATTHEW SCRUGGS to MICHAEL HOLT <=-
Welcome back.  I'd wondered what had happened to you.
 MS> That and a large proportion of abduction cases are investigated by
 MS> hypnosis, a shaky tool at best. Some of the contradictions might be
 MS> explained by inexperienced investigators using a highly subjective
 MS> methodology.
 
I hear more contradictions about hypnosis than I hear about anything 
else. I can't imagine using a tool that controversial, at least, not using
it as the sole instrument.
 MS> For what its worth, I think there is something to this abduction
 MS> business. However not in the numbers talked & speculated about! That
 MS> is a logical absurdity.
I'm not sure that term "logical absurdity," however apparently accurate,
can be used in any discussion of this sort without making some broad
assumptions without the favor of solid information. 
 
However, the simple numbers involved do cry out for some explanation. 
If it is real, there's a lot going on.  If abductions are not real, we
are still faced with a phenomenon of mind-boggling proportions.
 MS> I do believe however if it resembles an eye & is located in the
 MS> general are it is an eye or an eye analog.
 
It's my assumption that the eye is not a real eye as we know it.  
The point I was making was that we really know very little and what 
we do know can be contradictory.
                                                  Michael
... I'd love to, but I'm still recovering from the last time I did.
--- FMail 0.98
---------------