From: "Robert G Lewis" 

"Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
news:opshp9lvogeipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:35:17 -0600, Robert G Lewis 
> wrote:
>
>> Yes that should not have occurred. They should have just been replaced.
>> Now
>> what does THAT have to do with political appointees ( US Attorneys) being
>> replaced ?
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>>
>>
>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>> news:opshp8aui6eipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:10:51 -0600, Robert G Lewis
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> US Attorneys are political appointees , replacing them is legal .
>>>>
>>>> Bob Lewis
>>>>
>>> I'm sure the travel office employees that Clinton framed to get rid of
>>> them (and were easily acquitted) will take comfort in that.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Wiltshire
>>
>>
>
> What did replacing US Attorneys have to do with the shakeup in the CIA?
>
> --
> Gary Wiltshire

Ask Jeff , He's the one who mentioned that. I was merely pointing out that
US Attorneys are Political Appointees..

Now what is your point about the travel office ?

Bob Lewis

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5