From: "Robert G Lewis" 

Yeah but I think DeLay is MUCH better at it than his current counterparts
on the Democratic side

Bob Lewis

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:419ec5e0$2{at}w3.nls.net...
>I don't have any particular love for Delay, he strikes me as the
>quintessential politician, nothing more, nothing less. I'm sure they (him
>and his counterparts on both sides) have similar new dumb rules on their
>notepads as I type... 
>
>
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:419ec131$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> I'll agree while I laugh that Delay was one of the people behind the rule
>> in the first place 
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:419ebcaa{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> It's hard to keep track of all the petty BS on both sides, but I still
>>> maintain that it's a dumb rule that deserves to be eliminated.
>>>
>>> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote
in message
>>> news:419eaecf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> The original Rule was aimed as Dan Roskonski on the dem side. The
>>>> republicans were not in control and it made a good ( and
appropriate )
>>>> point. Delay was one of those pushing it then. Now that the rule he
>>>> pushed affects him .......
>>>>
>>>> Bob Lewis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>>>> news:419e9dac$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> The rule sounds like a dumb thing, period. That said,
as far as I
>>>>> gather, the Dems have no such rule for their side, so
it seems odd
>>>>> that they're sqawking like chickens smooshed under a
truck tire over
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> "John Cuccia" 
wrote in message
>>>>> news:a56tp0pucrr50vbeaifp9kh68q8ir7fke9{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:57:14 -0500,
"Mark" 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How many, of those 15 indictments brought,
resulted in convictions? I
>>>>>>>think
>>>>>>>that removal of anyone from any position based
merely on an idictment
>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>wrong and am glad to see the rule change,
regardless of which side
>>>>>>>appears
>>>>>>>to gain from same at the present time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How did you feel about the rule when it was
imposed by Republicans at
>>>>>> the expense of Democrats?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5