From: "Robert G Lewis" 

I'll agree while I laugh that Delay was one of the people behind the rule
in the first place 

Bob Lewis

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:419ebcaa{at}w3.nls.net...
> It's hard to keep track of all the petty BS on both sides, but I still
> maintain that it's a dumb rule that deserves to be eliminated.
>
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:419eaecf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> The original Rule was aimed as Dan Roskonski on the dem side. The
>> republicans were not in control and it made a good ( and appropriate )
>> point. Delay was one of those pushing it then. Now that the rule he
>> pushed affects him .......
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>>
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>> news:419e9dac$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> The rule sounds like a dumb thing, period. That said, as far as I
>>> gather, the Dems have no such rule for their side, so it seems odd that
>>> they're sqawking like chickens smooshed under a truck tire over this.
>>>
>>> "John Cuccia"  wrote in message
>>> news:a56tp0pucrr50vbeaifp9kh68q8ir7fke9{at}4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:57:14 -0500, "Mark"
 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>How many, of those 15 indictments brought, resulted in
convictions? I
>>>>>think
>>>>>that removal of anyone from any position based merely
on an idictment
>>>>>is
>>>>>wrong and am glad to see the rule change, regardless of
which side
>>>>>appears
>>>>>to gain from same at the present time.
>>>>
>>>> How did you feel about the rule when it was imposed by
Republicans at
>>>> the expense of Democrats?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5