From: jeff 

Robert G Lewis wrote:
> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
> news:opshp9lvogeipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>
>>On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:35:17 -0600, Robert G Lewis

>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yes that should not have occurred. They should have just been replaced.
>>>Now
>>>what does THAT have to do with political appointees ( US Attorneys) being
>>>replaced ?
>>>
>>>Bob Lewis
>>>
>>>
>>>"Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>>>news:opshp8aui6eipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:10:51 -0600, Robert G Lewis
>>>>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>US Attorneys are political appointees , replacing them is legal .
>>>>>
>>>>>Bob Lewis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'm sure the travel office employees that Clinton framed to
get rid of
>>>>them (and were easily acquitted) will take comfort in that.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Gary Wiltshire
>>>
>>>
>>What did replacing US Attorneys have to do with the shakeup in the CIA?
>>
>>--
>>Gary Wiltshire
>
>
> Ask Jeff , He's the one who mentioned that. I was merely pointing out that
> US Attorneys are Political Appointees..
>
> Now what is your point about the travel office ?
>
> Bob Lewis
>
>
They were fired and procecuted... the CIA guys simply quit.

Be interesting to see if the number of intel related "press
leaks" decreases.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5