From: "Robert G Lewis" 

"Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
news:opshqibnl8eipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:46:16 -0600, Robert G Lewis 
> wrote:
>
>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>> news:opshp9lvogeipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:35:17 -0600, Robert G Lewis
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes that should not have occurred. They should have just
been replaced.
>>>> Now
>>>> what does THAT have to do with political appointees ( US Attorneys)
>>>> being
>>>> replaced ?
>>>>
>>>> Bob Lewis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>>>> news:opshp8aui6eipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:10:51 -0600, Robert G Lewis
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> US Attorneys are political appointees , replacing
them is legal .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob Lewis
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure the travel office employees that Clinton
framed to get rid of
>>>>> them (and were easily acquitted) will take comfort in that.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gary Wiltshire
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> What did replacing US Attorneys have to do with the shakeup in the CIA?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Wiltshire
>>
>> Ask Jeff , He's the one who mentioned that. I was merely pointing out
>> that
>> US Attorneys are Political Appointees..
>>
>> Now what is your point about the travel office ?
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>>
>>
>
> My point is that a president should have the right to remake his
> government without making excuses - unlike President Clinton and her
> husband.
>
> --
> Gary Wiltshire

Which to a certain extent I agree with.

Bob Lewis

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5