-=> Quoting Bob Klahn to Frank Scheidt <=-
 
 BK>> Well, those of you who insisted you wanted to get Wilson under
 BK>> oath, under penalty of perjury, looks like you'll get your wish.
 
 BK>> Of course, the republicans could have had that any time they
 BK>> wanted, just call him before congress and require him to testify
 BK>> under oath.
 
 BK>> Since they chose not to, you'll have to settle for a lawsuit,
 BK>> filed by Joe and Valerie Wilson. And guess who gets named. How
 BK>> about Dick Cheney. And will he have to testify? Well, when it
 BK>> was Clinton, in a lawsuit the judge ruled was absolutely without
 BK>> merit, he had to testify anyway. Now that it's Cheney, he's only
 BK>> the VP, he has less of an excuse. Wanna see Cheney weasle?
 
 BK>> Karl Rove, your witness chair is waiting.
 
 BK>> I am lookng forward to this. Hope you are too.
 
 FS> Don't hold you breath, Bob.  Apparently the charge is
 FS> entirely without merit and will be thrown out ...

 BK> Not likely on either point.

 BK> And if you really want to see Wilson testify under oath you
 BK> should hope it does not get thrown out.

Maybe I feel *sorry* for the poor, misguided guy ... [sigh] ...

... "Sprechen Sie English?"         "Nyet."

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5