Once apon a time Bill Grimsley said, 'Re: Dynalink 33.6k' to Simon Byrnand...



 BG> I spoke with Dynalink just yesterday, and they did actually

 BG> acknowledge the problem, presumably because the buggy model

 BG> has since been replaced by a fully functional version (one of

 BG> which I'm about to evaluate).



 SB> Interesting. Do you mean that they have replaced it with a

 SB> model that is still a USR Sportster clone, but doesnt have

 SB> the bug? (IE a later version)



 BG> Same TI-based modem, different supervisor date and EPROM revision.



Good, that confirms what I thought about mine.



 SB> Or is it a different design altogether? I know for a fact

 SB> that they now have a Rockwell based 33.6K Voice/Fax/Data out,

 SB> as I've seen it. Is this the one?



 BG> No, only the 33k6 externals are Rockwell-based.  The internal is TI.



BZZZZT! Wrong! :-) Like I said, I have SEEN and INSTALLED an *internal*

Dynalink 33.6K Voice/Fax/Data nearly a month ago, and it was Rockwell

based. The TI/USR Clone was the first and only internal Dynalink 33.6K

model for quite a while, but Dynalink now has a whole range of 33.6K

internals - including the aformentioned Fax/Data TI/USR Clone we both

have, and the Voice/Fax/Data Rockwell based one I mentioned.



 SB> After you have evaluated it, could you post the ATI screens?



 BG> Already done (and you'll have seen it by now).



Yes I have thanks..



Regards,

Simon



... Civilization: Biggest syntax error in history!

--- FMail/386 1.02