From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:GP1Mh.14719$tD2.6798{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net, Andrealphus
 typed:
> In News 1r1Mh.12288$_a1.9719{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> In news:6%_Lh.15297$Jl.12344{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>> In News _rILh.25235$68.10690{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>
>>>> In news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>> In News B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In
news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>> In News
gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>>>>>> Free Lunch  typed:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41 -0400, in
alt.atheism
>>>>>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>>>>>>>
:
>>>>>>>>>> In
news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>>>>>> Dionisio
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> thomas p.
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if the law is
changed, and, in some places, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By the constitutionally
required process?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Judicial review *is* a
Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of cases brought to court, not of
laws that were
>>>>>>>>>> constitutionally enacted. The
judical branch is not the the
>>>>>>>>>> "E" in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your idiocy is easily dismissed as
high treason.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You clearly are ignorant of our
Constitution. Please do not
>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, it would give the assassins a real
target for a change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?
>>>>
>>>> WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it?
>>>
>>> So, you're going to be on a space shuttle, sitting on the Earth?
>>
>> You have no concept of weightlessness in space?
>> Resistance/inertia would still be effective.
>
> What's holding you and the bowflex down?

Engineering a foreign concept to you?

>>
>>>> With more than one shuttle I could order a pizza from dominoes.
>>>> Gotta have a television, too, you know?
>>>> I bet reception is really clear from there, don't you?
>>>
>>> I think you should adjust the antennae on your tinfoil hat.
>>
>> I thought you wanted everyone to have a good time.
>> If that is true, then when are you going to start acting like it?
>
> Who said anything about wanting everyone to have a good time?

You , I would assume.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag