> > > PF:-
> > > Since an Edserian abolute fitness is ~exactly~ one reproduced
> > > generation..

> > JE:-
> > Incorrect.

>PF:-
> I will concede that a suitable amendment to what I wrote would be to make
> sure that every instance of "absolute fitness" would be
preceded by "one
> Edserian", but that otherwise my interpretation of your counting
> of absolute
> fitnesses was generously accommodating of your own definition an absolute
> fitness-count of 1.
> With amendments it would look like this instead:
> Since one Edserian abolute fitness is ~exactly~ one reproduced generation,

JE:-
Incorrect

JE:-
Absolute fitness is defined as:
The total number of fertile forms
reproduced into one population by
a parent.

This will consist of
n generations where n is
only _minimally_ = 1.

>snip<

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia

edser{at}tpg.com.au
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 8/4/04 12:34:45 PM