| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Back to topic... |
On 28 Jan 05 16:07:58, Sharon Coyne got back to Danny Ceppa -> Re: Back to topic... SC>> there is joint custody or just visitation, it has to be honored SC>> or the offending party could get into trouble. DC> She organized things to conflict with my time. And, as the kids DC> were old enough not to have to come, they often didn't. SC> That wouldn't have stopped her from getting into trouble though. A SC> court order is a court order. I'm sure the courts would have made her SC> change her habit of doing that. Fear of jail would have done it. You still don't understand how that works around here! SC> Although my grandkids don't see their dad at his choosing, being older, SC> they have things to do that would conflict if they saw him all of the SC> time. My daughter was told though that if they had plans, say a party SC> to go to or something at school, since it would be his time to have SC> them, he would have to get them there and back. SC> I don't know what was in your court papers or much else about your SC> situation, but she got away with breaking the law. Unfortunately, that wasn't the case. --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:123/666.0) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 123/666 500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.