From: Ad 

Geo. wrote:
> There is only one good energy source that won't screw up the planet,
> nuclear.
>

It's always been the number 1 source of energy for the planet both in terms
of off world & subterranean power sources.

Adam

> Geo.
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:45b8bbc8{at}w3.nls.net...
>> We have to cut down oil usage somehow, that's the real terrorist
>> threat that you seem to be so concerned about.
>>
>> I'm not saying ethanol is the correct way to go, but *something* has
>> to be done to cut down on our reliance of foreign oil.  The less oil
>> we need, the less meddling we have to do, and the less meddling, the
>> less animosity towards us.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:45b82df5{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> I think I recall a few intellectual arguments against my disdain for
>>> using "corn for fuel."
>>>
>>> If I recall correctly those arguments were along the lines of
"global
>>> energy generation transcends the minutia of food vs. fuel," because
>>> it's all the same thing in the end and taking corn off the food
>>> market to satisfy the transportation market was no big deal because
>>> lower oil prices would offset any effects...
>>>
>>> Perhaps those arguments were misplaced:
>>>
>>>
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0701130049jan13,0,5505881.story
>>>
>>> "Ethanol's effect: Expensive tortillas"
>>>
>>> I guess starving out the Mexicans is an acceptable trade-off for
>>> enriching the ethanol producers in the US?
>>>
>>> For me, I like Exxon/Mobil over ADM 8 days a week.
>>>
>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5