From: "Robert G Lewis" 


"Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message
news:pan.2004.12.11.03.53.07.244795{at}shultzinfosystems.com...
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:07:27 -0600, Robert G Lewis wrote:
>
>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
>> news:opsis2nbwieipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:07:45 -0600, Robert G Lewis
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Glenn Meadows" 
wrote in message
>>>> news:41b9c49d{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Seems the deeper story is that the question was either
a plant by a
>>>>> news reporter from the Chattanoga Times, or was actually from an
>>>>> embedded reporter from the same newspaper.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> To me the real story is do our troops have the resources
they need and
>>>> is the  guard and reserve treated worse than the active
duty troops. I
>>>> could care less where the question came from. I only want
to know the
>>>> truth about
>>>> the issues. Given the reports of the applause given the question I
>>>> suspect
>>>> there is at least some truth to the story.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bob Lewis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, and the fact that Rathergate was based on forgeries was irrelevent
>>> because the content of those forgeries was true.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Wiltshire
>>
>> Not the same thing and you should be bright enough to realize it. Are the
>> benefits and pay to the Guard and Reserve different than those for active
>> duty ? I don't care if the reporter worked with someone in phasing the
>> question or not as that doesn't affect the truth of the facts. I guess
>> its
>> a lot easier if you decide the messenger disagrees with you so ignore the
>> message.
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>
> Benefits fo Guard and Reserve are equivalent, if not better, than regular
> force. I've seen where their college benefits could be considered to be
> better, at the very least.
>
>
Does this include when they are on duty - How is retirement accrued ?  What
about medical for those injured on active duty ?

Bob Lewis

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5