Hi Tom, as you were just saying about Censorship....
TR> TC> I begin to think that your scope is a bit too narrow... Let me try
TR> TC> to widen it some. Think of construction, mining, military,
TR> TC> police, medical (yes, medical), transportation, etc. Think if we had
TR> TC> no knowledge of explosives at all. Shall we take it to the extreme?
TR>
TR> Knowledge of explosives in these areas is already available with
TR> no problems. I have no problem with "a need to know basis". What I
TR> would have a problem with is information being made available to the
TR> general public "without a need to know." This is what we were really
TR> talking about.
Who makes that distinction? You? Me? How about the farm boy who
learns from his father how to blow stumps with ANFO? The only
difference between a stump and OKC is the amount.
RD
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
X KWQ/2 1.2i X I would strongly oppose apathy.....if I cared..
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------
* Origin: DPSystem:4285 OS2-WARPED 520-290-8418 USR V.e+ (1:300/105)
|