| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: New CO Rape Victim Bill-of-Rights Law Is Pro-Choice; Pro-Rapist Chr |
From: "John D.Wentzky"
"BobR" wrote in message
news:1174486481.500611.229060{at}e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> RAPE is a CRIME and nobody besides the rapist should be forced to pay
> for that crime.
Meaning that destroying evidence of the rape would be a serious crime.
> YES, a woman should absolutely be offered the
> opportunity to prevent the implantation of any possible result of rape
> in her womb.
Destroying evidence is a serious crime.
> I am and have always been against abortion and I will
> always be but with the exception of cases involving RAPE, INCEST, and
> where the health of the mother is at stake.
I won't. I do not like abortion in the case of incest. And, I do not like
emergency contraception in the case of rape if there is no semen to gather
as evidence.
> In those cases, society has no right to dictate that a pregnancy be
> carried through.
Your error is that society does have a right to dictate what abortion
policy should be.
Your opinion is only relevant as it pertains to what you 'think' abortion
policy should be.
Your opinion is only one of some 300,000,00 persons' opinions.
> In all other cases, abortion is taking a life and that life should be
> protected by society.
But, in your world there are exceptions. LOL!
What a joke.
--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.