PN>Dan was returning fire
PN> about Guns while the rest of us took cover
PN> DA> There's also something about Goetz's criminal trial that never has
PN> DA> made  any sense to me. The jury found that the shooting was
PN> DA> self-defense, but  found him guilty of possessing a firearm. How is 
t
PN> DA> possible for someone  to have a right of self-defense, but *not* have
PN> DA> the right to possess  the means of self-defense?
PN> It was New York, sir.  Nobody ever said anything about it making any
PN> sense. 
And oh lord, isn't Schumer from there as well!
 * OLX 2.1 * Diplomacy is saying "nice doggy" until you find a rock.
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------