Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:
 JM>> Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:
 JM>>>> Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:
 JM>>>>>> Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:

 JM>>>>>>>> First of all the 1902 date is
suspicious. Your pall Ross S
 JM>>>>>>>> announced the site where the story came
from is a satire
 JM>>>>>>>> site. OOPS.

 BK>>>>>>>  Which neither surprises me nor impresses
me. There are slaves in
 BK>>>>>>>  this country today.

 JM>>>>>> I'm sure you believe that.

 BK>>>>>  Anyone who keeps up with the news beyond the broadcast
 BK>>>>>  soundbites knows it is true.

 JM>>>> I'm sure you believe that.

 BK>>>  You aren't seriously going to tell me you don't, are you?

 JM>> Prove there is legal slavery in the U.S. today.

 BK>  The claim I originally responded to was that slavery ended over
 BK>  100 years ago. Richardson repeated that in another msg on this.
 BK>  You are the only one who changed the wording to "legal slavery".
 BK>  I did not nor do I intend to argue "legal" slavery.


Good because you would loose.

As to what you call slavery; I can't help it people still work for unions.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)