From: "Anlatt the Builder" 

On Mar 20, 11:23 pm, lorad...{at}cs.com wrote:
> On Mar 20, 1:56 pm, No One  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > lorad...{at}cs.com writes:
> > > On Mar 20, 7:45 am, rfisc...{at}sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> > > >   wrote:
> > > > > "Mark Sebree"  wrote:
> > > > >> And that is what you want, for homosexuals to
have less privileges
> > > > >> than heterosexuals.  You do not want
homosexuals to have equal
rights.
>
> > > > >it's not necessarily individuals or even religions
that mandate that
> > > > >same-sex marriages are a contradiction in terms. It
is Nature itself
> > > > >who makes the definitive statement.
>
> > > > And that is a flat-out lie.  Nature makes no such statement.
>
> > > Of course Nature does. You will have no progeny. You are a walking
> > > extinction.
> > > No, it is NOT "common in nature".
> > > It is exceptional and abnormal and selected out of the gene-pool.
>
> > Nonsense.  If it was "selected out", we wouldn't see it at all.
>
> Wrong again. Check out the concept of recessive genetic
> (non)expression.
>
> > BTW, some recent research showed that gays are more likely to be
> > from larger than average families, and there is a correlation with
> > the families of maternal aunts.  This suggests that some combination
> > of genes that increase fertility in females also increases the
> > chances of producing gay offspring
>
> Increasingly though, imo, the problem is an environmental one - rather
> than genetic.
> Population density itself has been shown to induce uh.. non-standard..
> orientation.
> Psychologically screwed up parents also contribute to the.. uh..
> phenomenon

Can you actually point to a peer-reviewed study that even suggests that
"psychologically screwed up parents" contribute to homosexuality?
Or are you just making it up? Where do you get your information?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag