Hi RICH, as you were just saying about Re: Home Security....
RG> -> Why would a doctor's training have anything to do with how that doctor
RG> -> should react in regard to a bank robbery or a dime store sale?  If
RG> -> there is a medical emergency, I could understand it, but not if it was
RG> -> something outside his area of expertise.
RG> 
RG> The doctor, nurse EMT comment was in regards to a medical
RG> emergency of some sort.
I agree with that.  It is just that part of the thread had encompassed
general situations, not just one where training was an integral part.
 
RG> -> You are still hanging in there on a plumbing job.  I agreed with you
RG> -> on that.  Then, I said "in general" meaning under general conditions 
f
RG> -> law, not just the expectations from a plumbing job.
RG> 
RG> Take any example, have you neighbor help you do plastic surgery on
RG> your dog, don't make much difference, then try to sue for damages :)
I understand what you are saying.  My only point is that the 'higher
standard' *only* applies to situations where a particular expertise is
required and only that expertise should be applied.  In the case of a
police officer or an EMT technician, or a lawyer,  it should only be
during the performance of his/her duties.
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X For every silver lining there is a big, dark cloud....  :^(
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------