| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | In case you missed the co |
Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote: DC>>>>> Approx 88% of whites could read. Only about 22% of blacks were DC>>>> literate. DC>>>> see tinyurl.com/63k7t7 JM>>>> Ok I looked. It said nothing about southern whites. DC>>> The info should be sufficient to make a reasonable conclusion. JM>> Bovine excrement, You have shown nothing that shows poor JM>> whites in the south were more literate than slaves. BK> He did say a reasonable conclusion, not firm proof. Like I said, BK> the stats I found were not broken down in detail either. With out stats on share croppers and other dirt poor southerners in the 1860/70's, I don't think a fair conclusion can be made. I sure don't think it come close to proving the claim made. --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)* Origin: The Eastern Star - Fidonet Via Your Newsreader (1:123/789.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 140/1 226/0 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 SEEN-BY: 261/100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 396/45 633/260 SEEN-BY: 633/267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 2905/0 @PATH: 123/789 500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.