From: "Gregg N" 

Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>> Most people read 0x23 as hex-twenty-three, or twenty-three-hex, not
>> as thirty-five. Both are correct, if you consider the
"-hex" part of
>> the name.
>
> I've never heard anyone read 0x23 as hex-twenty-three or
> twenty-three-hex, but as two-three-hex or hex-two-three.

I sometimes recite the individual digits as well, but usually only when
there are a large number of digits. For 0x23, I would probably just say
twenty-three hex. It is unambiguous as long as the "hex" is
added.

>  How then do you read 0xCC?

That is the other time I recite digits. Hmmm, maybe I could call it
"seedy-see".

Gregg

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5